Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-09-26 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.32 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Lemon Green, Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 4000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is a little bit better than Xiaomi 14T, having an 83.8 score against 83.7. The Galaxy A50 body is lighter and just a little thinner than the Xiaomi 14T, even though it was released many years before. Xiaomi 14T has a lot better screen than Galaxy A50, because it has a just a bit greater pixels density, a little bit bigger display and a bit higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels.
The Galaxy A50 has a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi 14T, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much faster processing unit than Xiaomi 14T, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Xiaomi 14T has longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 25% more battery size. The Xiaomi 14T captures better pictures and videos than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Xiaomi 14T also has a lot more MP back facing camera, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor and a much higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.