Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-09-26 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.32 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Lemon Green, Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 4000 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi 14T is much better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, getting a score of 83.7 against 75.8. The Xiaomi 14T design is newer and notably thinner, but just a bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a much better performing processor than Xiaomi 14T, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and less cores.
Xiaomi 14T features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per display inch and a bit lower resolution of 1220 x 2712px, it also counts with a way bigger screen and way more brightness. Xiaomi 14T counts with a greater camera than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same aperture, the Xiaomi 14T also has a lot better resolution back-facing camera and better video frame rates.
Xiaomi 14T features much more storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Xiaomi 14T features superior battery duration than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.