Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-09-26 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.32 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Lemon Green, Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 4000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than Xiaomi 14T, with a 94.6 score against 83.7. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 construction is thinner than the Xiaomi 14T, although it's much heavier and was released many years before. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version and Xiaomi 14T has Android 14.
Xiaomi 14T features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1220 x 2712px, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much powerful processor than Xiaomi 14T. Both of them have a 12 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores.
The Xiaomi 14T features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi 14T also has a larger camera aperture to capture better low light images and videos, a bigger camera sensor capturing better quality photographs and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's storage for games and applications is just as good as Xiaomi 14T's one, they have the same internal storage. The Xiaomi 14T has just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.