Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | iOS 9.x |
| 2019-10-20 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Iceberg grey and Shadow black | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 575.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 750 x 1334 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A9 APL0898 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 3.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 6s is slightly better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, getting a overall score of 83 against 82.9. Apple iPhone 6s counts with iOS 9.x operating system, while Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro comes with Android 9.0 Pie operating system. Even though Apple iPhone 6s is incredibly older than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, it's design is thinner and a lot lighter.
Apple iPhone 6s counts with a little better performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because although it has lesser RAM and less and slower cores, it also counts with a graphics processing unit and a 64-bits CPU. The Apple iPhone 6s features just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because although it has a little worse pixels quantity in each inch in the screen, a really smaller screen and a much lower 1334 x 750 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit brighter display.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro captures much better photos and videos than Apple iPhone 6s, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also has a bigger aperture, faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a way bigger sensor taking lot better quality photos and videos and a back facing camera with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro and iPhone 6s both feature very similar memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have equal internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features a really longer battery lifetime than iPhone 6s, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 1715mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.