Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-20 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Iceberg grey and Shadow black | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel 3a's global score of 78.8. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has 9.0 Pie version while Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 version. Despite being the best in this comparison review, Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro's construction is a little thicker and heavier than the Google Pixel 3a.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a little bit better screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit bigger screen.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a much better storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro shoots greater photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same video definition and a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also has a lot more megapixels camera, better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a way larger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has better battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.