Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Iceberg grey and Shadow black | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a global score of 82.9, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro's general score of 82.9. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a has older 11 version and Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Google Pixel 4a design is newer, just a little thinner and notably lighter than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features just a bit better display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a bit worse pixel number per inch in the screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340px resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also counts with a little bigger display.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light captures, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also counts with a much more MP camera, better 60 fps video frame rates and a much larger camera sensor capturing lot better quality photos.
The Google Pixel 4a and Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro feature very similar storage capacity for apps and games, they have exactly the same internal memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features greater battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 27% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.