Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Iceberg grey and Shadow black | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is a little bit better than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, getting a overall score of 87.5 against 82.9. The Google Pixel 4a 5G design is newer, just a little bit thinner and lighter than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has the previous 11 version and Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has Android 9.0 Pie.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has just a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a little bit better screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixel amount per inch of display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also counts with a quite bigger display.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with as much storage to install applications and games as the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, they have exactly the same internal storage. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro takes much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light images, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also counts with a lot larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much more MP camera in the back.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features just a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3885mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.