Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Iceberg grey and Shadow black | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, getting an 82.9 score against 81.9. Although it's the best we compare here, it must be noted that it's also noticeably older, a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a newer 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14, so it gives you some nice extra features and better performance.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both have a 8 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a lot better looking screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, and although they both have a same size screen, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a bit higher 1256 x 2760px resolution, a bit higher screen pixels density and way more brightness.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro captures slightly better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a back-facing camera with lesser mega-pixels, a lower video quality and a way smaller sensor which gives a lot worse photo and video quality, they both have the same aperture. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has just a little better battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.