Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Iceberg grey and Shadow black | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro's 82.9 global score. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an older 14 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a noticeably newer cellphone, and it is also a little bit lighter and a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a sharper display than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because although it has a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a way brighter display, a little larger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures slightly better photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a more mega-pixels back facing camera, a larger camera aperture and a much larger back-facing camera sensor.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has 384 GB more internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has a 13 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.