Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Iceberg grey and Shadow black | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPS |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro is just a bit better than the Moto G 5G, with a general score of 82.9 against 81.5. Despite of the fact that the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro is older than Moto G 5G, it's design is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Moto G 5G has Android 10, counting with some additional features and performance tweaks.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a little sharper display than Moto G 5G, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel density. Moto G 5G features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features just a bit better processing power than Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also has more RAM memory. Moto G 5G has improved battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features a little bit better camera than Moto G 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have a back facing camera with a 48 mega-pixels resolution and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.