Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Iceberg grey and Shadow black | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro's 82.9 overall score. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS, but the Motorola razr (2020) has an older 11 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has Android 9.0 Pie. The Motorola razr (2020) body is newer, somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features a little bit better looking display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a bit higher amount of pixels in each display inch, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit bigger display. Motorola razr (2020) has a much better storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a bit superior processing unit than Motorola razr (2020). Both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a way better battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4000mAh battery size. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the same sensor size and a back camera with a 48 mega-pixels resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also counts with higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.