Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-20 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Iceberg grey and Shadow black | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro's 82.9 global score. The Galaxy A52 is a newer device, and it's also a little thinner and a little bit lighter than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features a little better performance than Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also has more RAM.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, although it has a little smaller screen, a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little lower display density. The Galaxy A52 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality and a back-facing camera with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy A52 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A52 also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a little longer battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.