Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Iceberg grey and Shadow black | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is slightly better than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, having an 88.1 score against 82.9. These devices have Android operating system, but the Galaxy F62 has the previous 11 version and Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy F62 design is newer, but just a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a higher amount of RAM and more cores. Galaxy F62 counts with a screen that's very similar to Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro's display, because although the Galaxy F62 has less bright screen and a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Galaxy F62 counts with much more storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy F62 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 features a very superior battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Galaxy F62 has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a back camera with lot more megapixels and a bigger sensor taking higher quality photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.