Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Iceberg grey and Shadow black | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is much better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro's general score of 82.9. The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a heavier phone than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, but both of them are equally thin. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has the previous 13 version and Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both of them have 8 processing cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a better looking screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has much more display brightness, a just a little better amount of pixels in each inch of screen, a bit larger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra takes better videos and photos than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot more mega pixels camera, a much bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features as much memory capacity to install games and applications as the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro one, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has improved battery life than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.