Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-20 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Iceberg grey and Shadow black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a global score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 overall score. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro is a way newer and thinner cellphone than the Galaxy S7 Active, although it's just a bit heavier. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a sharper screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px, more pixels per inch in the display and a little bit brighter screen.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a bit better processor than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also counts with a camera with a way higher resolution and faster video frame rate. The Galaxy S7 Active and Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro both have quite similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.