Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Iceberg grey and Shadow black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is slightly better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, having an 88.5 score against 82.9. The Galaxy Z Flip body is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, although both of them were only released 4 months apart. Both devices we are comparing here come with Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip has older 12 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, a quite smaller display and a little bit less pixels per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a superior memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro feature very similar processors, both have a 8 GB RAM and the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same video quality, the same 60 fps video frame rates and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also has a lot larger camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality and a much better resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.