Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Iceberg grey and Shadow black | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, getting a global score of 94.6 against 82.9. Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is newer and noticeably thinner than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro's, but it's a lot heavier. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version and Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor offering a worse image quality, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same camera aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also counts with a lot more mega pixels back camera.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.