Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-28 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Black Shark 2's score of 82.3. Apple iPhone X's body is somewhat lighter and thinner than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, despite of the fact that it was released about a year before. The iPhone X counts with a slightly better display than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a brighter display, a bit higher quantity of pixels per display inch and a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px.
IPhone X features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. IPhone X counts with a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores and slower, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has a much better camera than Apple iPhone X, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 also counts with a much bigger camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality and a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has a much better battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 47 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.