Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-28 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2, with a global score of 87.1 against 82.3. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has Android 10. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra body is much newer, just a little thinner and just a little lighter than Xiaomi Black Shark 2.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 features a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because although it has a little inferior count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, much more brightness and a quite larger display.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos, higher video frame rates, a lot larger sensor taking way higher quality photos and videos and a back facing camera with more MP.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because it has more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bit superior battery duration than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because it has a 13% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.