Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-28 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Silver | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is much better than Xiaomi Black Shark 2's 82.3 global score. Galaxy A52 is a newer device, and it's also just a little bit lighter and a bit thinner than Xiaomi Black Shark 2. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A52, although it has a little lower display pixels density, a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit smaller screen.
The Galaxy A52 counts with much more storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A52 captures clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 also has a bigger sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures and a camera with a lot better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because it has a 13 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.