Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-03-28 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Silver | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, with a overall score of 91.3 against 82.3. The Galaxy A52 5G construction is newer, a little bit thinner and a bit lighter than Xiaomi Black Shark 2. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has Android 10, so it gives a lot of extra features and increased performance.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has a bit better performance than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a quite worse pixels density, a quite smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution.
Galaxy A52 5G has a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same (4K) video resolution and the same aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a bigger back camera sensor which gives a higher image and video quality and a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Galaxy A52 5G has a much greater memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.