Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-03-28 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2, having a score of 95.4 against 82.3. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's construction has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2, but it's somewhat heavier. Both devices we compare here have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has Android 10 version, so it provides the user a lot of extra features.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra. They have 8 GB of RAM memory and 8 processing cores. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a more vivid display than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a way brighter display, a little bit larger display and a just a bit greater display density.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has as much memory for apps and games as the Xiaomi Black Shark 2, both of them have exactly the same internal memory. Galaxy S22 Ultra takes much clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much higher 108 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a way better video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features greater battery lifetime than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.