Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-28 | -- |
| 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.23 ounces | -- |
| Black and Silver | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 has a general score of 82.6, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2's general score of 82.3. Galaxy S25's body is extremely lighter and much thinner than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2. Both devices in this comparison review include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S25 has 14 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has Android 10, offering a couple nice extra features and a performance increase.
Galaxy S25 has a sharper display than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a little bit better number of pixels per display inch and a lot brighter screen. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 have quite similar memory capacity for games and applications, they have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 features a very superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy S25 has just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy S25 also has a way larger sensor shooting much better quality pictures, a camera in the back with more mega-pixels and a way better video definition.
Samsung Galaxy S25's battery performance is very similar to Xiaomi Black Shark 2's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.