Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-28 | -- |
| 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.23 ounces | -- |
| Black and Silver | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is much better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2's general score of 82.3. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a much lighter and a lot thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has Android 10 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because it has a lot brighter screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a bit higher screen pixels density and a little larger display. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a superior storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 counts with a much powerful processor than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has superior battery duration than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because it has a 25% more battery size. The Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots greater photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because it has a lot higher video resolution, a bigger aperture for better low light photos and videos, a way larger sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality and a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.