Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-03-28 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 403 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having a general score of 82.3 against 80.1. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 design is way thinner and somewhat lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though it was released only 12 months before.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a quite bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 also has 4 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 shoots greater pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photos, it also counts with a much higher 48 MP resolution camera, a much better (4K) video quality and a much larger back camera sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.