Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-08 | 2017-11-03 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Blasting black | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a bit better than the iPhone X, with a global score of 90.1 against 88.1. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's body is newer than the iPhone X's, although it is extremely heavier and incredibly thicker. The Apple iPhone X counts with a slightly better display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, although it has a way worse resolution of 1125 x 2436px, a little smaller display and a quite lower count of pixels per inch of screen.
The Apple iPhone X features a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores and they are also slower, it also counts with a 64-bit processor. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a back facing camera with much more MP and a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Apple iPhone X counts with as much memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos as the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, both of them have the same 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a really longer battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.