Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-08 | 2018-09-21 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Blasting black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a global score of 90.1, which is a little bit better than the iPhone XS's 84.2 overall score. Even though the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is newer than iPhone XS, it is incredibly heavier and a lot thicker. IPhone XS has a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, although it has a much lower resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels, a just a little less pixels per inch of display and a bit smaller screen.
Apple iPhone XS counts with a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of slower cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone XS, because it has 192 GB more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a much better battery duration than iPhone XS, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a way better camera than Apple iPhone XS, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a much higher 64 MP resolution back-facing camera and a lot bigger sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.