Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2020-08-20 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blasting black | Just black |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a bit better than the Google Pixel 4a, having a global score of 90.1 against 82.9. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has older 10 version and Google Pixel 4a has Android 11. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro construction is way heavier and a lot thicker than the Google Pixel 4a.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a just a little higher screen pixels density, a larger screen and a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit more powerful processor than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro takes greater videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing images and video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor which gives a much better image and video quality, higher video frame rate and a way more megapixels camera.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because it has more internal memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.