Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2020-11-19 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blasting black | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a bit better than Google Pixel 4a 5G, with a 90.1 score against 87.5. Even though the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is better than Google Pixel 4a 5G, we must highlight that it's also a incredibly thicker and way heavier phone. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has the older 10 version while Google Pixel 4a 5G has Android 11 version.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a little bigger display, a better 1440 x 3120px resolution and a just a little more pixels per inch of screen. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light images and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with a way more mega-pixels back facing camera and a lot bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 29% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.