Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2015-03-01 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Blasting black | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 484 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is better than HTC One M9, getting a global score of 90.1 against 77.7. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's design is extremely newer, but much heavier and just a little bit thicker than HTC One M9. Both devices in this comparison include Android OS, but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a more recent 10 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0.
HTC One M9 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics co-processor and a 64-bit processing unit. The HTC One M9 has a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, although it has a little worse pixels amount per inch in the display, a lot smaller display and a lot worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a much larger camera sensor taking lot higher quality pictures and videos, better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels and a larger aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a much better battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.