Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-08 | 2017-05-18 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Blasting black | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 484 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is much better than HTC U11, having a global score of 90.1 against 77.6. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's body is much newer than HTC U11's, but it's much thicker and heavier. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a little bit better hardware performance than HTC U11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM.
The HTC U11 has a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1440 x 2560px, it also counts with a quite higher pixels count in each inch of screen. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a superior storage capacity for apps and games than HTC U11, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro captures a lot better videos and photos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with better video frame rate, a way larger sensor and a back camera with way more mega pixels.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a way better battery duration than HTC U11, because it has a 67 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.