Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 10 | Android, HTC Sense UI |
| 2020-05-08 | 2018-01-17 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blasting black | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 484 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is better than the HTC U11 EYEs, getting a general score of 90.1 against 76.9. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro design is way newer, but somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than the HTC U11 EYEs. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has Android 10 OS, while HTC U11 EYEs counts with Android, HTC Sense UI OS.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has just a bit better looking display than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen and a bigger display. HTC U11 EYEs features a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a little faster CPU than HTC U11 EYEs, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a very superior camera than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing images and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with a camera with way more megapixels and faster video frame rates.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has improved battery performance than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has a 27% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.