Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-08 | 2021-01-14 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Blasting black | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 484 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is much better than Moto G Stylus (2021), getting a general score of 90.1 against 79.3. Although the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a better cellphone than Moto G Stylus (2021), it must be noted that it's also a just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has a little bigger display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a greater pixel amount in each inch of display. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a superior camera than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution camera and faster video frame rate.
The Moto G Stylus (2021) features a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has greater battery life than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.