Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-08 | 2017-06-29 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Blasting black | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is better than Moto Z2 Play, having a 90.1 score against 77.4. Although Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is newer than Moto Z2 Play, it is a lot heavier and thicker. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit better CPU than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a larger screen, a way better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a bit higher screen density. The Moto Z2 Play features a quite bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a much better battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro captures a lot better videos and photos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing photographs or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera and better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.