Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-05-08 | 2018-08-16 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Blasting black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is better than Motorola Moto Z3, with a overall score of 90.1 against 77.6. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has the previous 10 version and Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro design is newer, but extremely thicker and heavier than the Motorola Moto Z3.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has just a little better performance than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a better 1440 x 3120 resolution, a larger display and a bit greater pixels density.
Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a better memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a very superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro shoots greater videos and photos than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a larger aperture to take better images and video in low light situations, a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, better 60 fps video frame rate and a lot larger sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.