Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2019-12-04 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Blasting black | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 484 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has an overall score of 90.1, which is much better than Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 overall score. These phones work with Android OS, but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has the older 10 version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version. Despite being the best in this comparison, it must be told that it's also a a little heavier and somewhat thicker phone.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a little more vivid display than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution, a little larger screen and a just a little better pixels number in each inch of screen. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro captures a little bit better videos and photos than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a same resolution camera and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has faster video frame rate and a larger camera aperture for better captures and video in low light situations.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with longer battery life than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 25 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.