Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2020-09-02 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blasting black | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is much better than nubia Red Magic 5S, having a score of 90.1 against 76.2. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison, Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's construction is just a bit heavier and a bit thicker than the nubia Red Magic 5S. Both devices we are comparing here come with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System).
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has just a bit better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has a little bit bigger display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a better pixels count per inch of screen. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a much greater storage to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features a processor that's just as good as the CPU in Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, both have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit better battery lifetime than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro shoots a little bit better videos and photos than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have a same size back camera sensor, a same resolution back facing camera, the same video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has higher 60 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.