Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Oppo |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2020-05-21 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Blasting black | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is much better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, getting a general score of 90.1 against 77.7. Both phones in this comparison review have the same Android 10 operating system, so both should offer the same operating system features. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a incredibly heavier and notably thicker phone than the OPPO Find X2 Neo.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a bit more powerful CPU than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. OPPO Find X2 Neo has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a bit inferior pixels number per inch of display and a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit better camera than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with faster video frame rate, a back facing camera with a much better resolution and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
OPPO Find X2 Neo's memory capacity to install applications and games is very similar to Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's one, both of them have the same internal storage. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with improved battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has a 24 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.