Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2023-12-11 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Blasting black | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is much better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, having a general score of 90.1 against 79.9. Despite being the best device we compare here, Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a notably older, heavier and thicker device than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G. Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has the older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, although it has a quite smaller screen, a bit lower display pixel density and a way worse 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a much better performing processor than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with more memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a much more megapixels back facing camera, faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a way larger camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and pictures.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G and Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro count with very similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.