Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-08 | 2019-09-27 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Blasting black | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's score of 90.1. Samsung Galaxy Fold's construction is extremely thinner but somewhat heavier than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, and both were released only 7 months apart. Both devices in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has Android 10, giving you a couple nice extra features.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater display density and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much greater storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal storage.
Galaxy Fold counts with a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with a way larger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.