Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2020-09-11 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Blasting black | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 484 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has an overall score of 90.1, which is slightly better than Galaxy M51's 87.7 score. Despite being the best phone in this comparison, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro construction is just a bit heavier and a little thicker than Galaxy M51. These devices work with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System).
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because it has a little larger screen, a greater pixel amount per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120.
Galaxy M51 has a slightly better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a slightly better camera than Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, a F1.8 camera aperture and a back-facing camera with a 64 mega-pixels, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has better video frame rate and a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a very superior battery duration than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because it has a 40 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.