Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2022-01-11 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Blasting black | -- |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a general score of 90.1, which is slightly better than the Galaxy S21 FE's score of 89.1. These phones have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has an older 10 version and Galaxy S21 FE has Android 11 version. Even being the best phone we are comparing here, Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is an older, thicker and much heavier phone than Galaxy S21 FE.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3120, a bit larger display and a just a little more pixels per inch in the display. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a much bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S21 FE's processing unit is just as good as the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro one, and although the Galaxy S21 FE has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a greater camera than Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy S21 FE, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.