Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2014-06-23 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blasting black | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a general score of 90.1, which is much better than the Galaxy S5 Sport's 77.8 global score. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS, but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has 10 version and Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a noticeably newer cellphone than Galaxy S5 Sport, although it's thicker and heavier.
Galaxy S5 Sport has a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, although it has a bit lower screen density, a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a way smaller display. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and faster).
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a very superior camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has higher video frame rates, a much bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality, a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures and video.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 240 GB more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a superior battery performance than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.