Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2020-01-31 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blasting black | Black |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 484 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is much better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, getting a 90.1 score against 81. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has an older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro body is just a little heavier and a bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3120, a little better screen pixels density and a bit larger screen. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a little faster CPU than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro shoots greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light photography and video, it also counts with a back camera with way more megapixels, a lot higher video definition and a lot larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.