Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2020-02-14 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blasting black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is slightly better than the Galaxy Z Flip, with a 90.1 score against 88.5. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has an older 10 version and Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12 version. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's design is somewhat heavier and extremely thicker than Galaxy Z Flip.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro. They have a Octa-Core processor and 8 GB of RAM. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a quite larger display and a bit greater pixels density.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a way better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera and a way bigger sensor. The Galaxy Z Flip's memory capacity to store more apps and games is very similar to the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro one, they have the same internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a superior battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.