Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2020-08-07 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blasting black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's 90.1 overall score. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the newer 11 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has Android 10, giving you a couple nice extra features and enhanced performance. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is somewhat lighter and incredibly thinner than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, even when both were only released with a couple months difference.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a little bit larger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a just a little better pixel amount in each inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's storage to install games and applications is very similar to the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro one, they have equal 256 GB internal storage.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro. Both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a way better battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.