Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 75.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2022-11-01 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Blasting black | Frosted Blue, Onyx Black, Stardust Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has an overall score of 90.1, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro's global score of 75.7. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro construction is extremely older, heavier and incredibly thicker than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS, but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has the previous 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has Android 12.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has a bit better screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, although it has a little lower pixels density, a little smaller screen and a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a really superior performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has more RAM.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, because it has more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro and Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro have very similar battery durations. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with a lot more megapixels back camera, a larger camera aperture to take better captures in low-light environments and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.