Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2020-05-05 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blasting black | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 484 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a general score of 90.1, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's score of 81.1. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is an a little heavier and thicker cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. These phones work with the same Android 10 operating system, so they should provide the user the same operating system features.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a little bit bigger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a quite greater pixels number in each inch of screen. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has more RAM.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro captures slightly better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 64 mega pixels resolution, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a 0.59 inches sensor, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has higher video frame rate and a larger aperture.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's battery life is just as good as Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's battery duration, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a 5020mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.