Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2020-04-07 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blasting black | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 484 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a global score of 90.1, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's 79 general score. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's design is a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS, but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has an older 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11 version.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a little more pixels per display inch, a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a little larger display. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a quite bigger storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's battery duration is just as good as the battery duration in Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a way better resolution back facing camera, a larger sensor and better 60 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.