Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a global score of 86.6, which is better than the Motorola Moto G Power's general score of 76.1. Even being the best in our current comparison, Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is an a little thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone than Motorola Moto G Power. Both devices in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has 10 version and Motorola Moto G Power has Android 11 version.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a just a little lower number of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 shoots greater photos and videos than Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for taking images or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also counts with better 60 fps video frame rate, a way larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs and a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels.
The Motorola Moto G Power counts with a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G Power has just a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has a 6 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.